2.12.2022. "Aikaa pelataan monin eri keinoin viranomaisten taholta ja kaikki keinot eivät osoitettavasti ole olleet edes laillisiakaan." "Hyvä esimerkki on tuote nimeltä (tuotemerkki), vastaavan tyyppistä tuotetta on yritetty tuottaa Suomessakin ja tilaussopimus asiasta oli olemassa, viranomaiset estivät tuottamisen ja myynnin sekä tuolloin vähittäiskaupan. Infoa löytyy näistä kuva-albumeista jossa jossakin alkuperäinen artikkelikuva aiheesta on vuodelta 2008." "Artikkeleissa ja mediassakin vaikuttaisi olevan meneillään siirtymävaihe jossa julkaisuissa joko jatketaan entistä valhepropagandaa tai nyt uudempana ilmiönä annetaan mielikuvaa jossa ikäänkuin olisi jo peräti osittain hyväksyttyä kannabiksen tuotanto, myynti ja vähittäiskauppa, näinhän ei todellisuudessa kuitenkaan ole, kuka hyvänsä voi testata millainen on tilanne jos lähiapteekista menee kannabista kyselemään, öljynä tai teenä tai minä tahansa tuotteena. Lääkekannabista lääkärin kautta kyselleille on naurettu päin näköä ja kohdeltu halventavasti ynnä muuta. Esimerkiksi Codex alimentarius-säännöstön mukaan esimerkiksi kannabiksen vihermassarouheen olisi mahdollista olla saatavilla ja luontaistuotteista annettujen säännösten mukaisesti markkinoilla, kuluttajien saatavilla mutta käytännössä viranomaistahot estävät kaikin mahdollisin tavoin alan yleistymisen ja tuotannon joka on perusteltavissa oleva asia. Yhtenä esimerkkinä ruokaviraston vaatimus edellyttää kuitutuen THC-pitoisuusrajaa myös öljykannabiksen tuotannolle, joka, kuitutuki öljyhampulle siis, on todettu jo olevan mm. komission asetuksen vastainen asia. Tämäkin asia on tullut esille oikeustapauskokonaisuusasiassa johon liittyvät selvittelyt ovat kestäneet ilman tuloksia jo yli kymmenen vuotta ja jonka asiakokonaisuuden todellinen sisältö on vaiettu julkisuudesta vaikka asioiden selventämiseksi juurikin asioiden julkisen käsittelyn voisi ajatella selventevän alan ongelmia ja asioiden kuntoonsaamista." "Suuri sotku koko aihe ja ala jota ylenpalttinen cbd-kohkaus vielä lisää sekoittaa. #stopthethclie"

11:31 AM
You sent
information in a legal cultivation case in a so called hemp man vs state issue, base script and a wittness material text in a movie base "The growing season 2, future with humanity?" ---
You sent
Hemp man vs. state

The question is about applying for a fiber subsidy and the conditions for receiving it, to which oil hemp is not entitled, in the legal case Haara vs. Valtio - it has been shown that the fiber subsidy for oil hemp is even against the Commission's regulation to try to have. Compensations to Haara for various justifiable reasons have been paid less than 400 euros in the past, the amount is not sufficient. In addition, the economy around the issue has been badly mixed up, for example Finland destroyed a batch of cannabis that another EU country, Estonia, had already returned.

If the compensations were available as it should be, justifiable compensations would in turn pay the fees imposed on completely illegal grounds so that the matter could even be brought to a conclusion. 2.3.2022, Finland has not replaced the batch of cannabis it disposed of, which had already been handed over by the authorities in another country. The legal and research costs caused by the production of the batch are also thus unpaid, and there are probably more new one illegal activityes coming. It would also be good to take into account the prevention of professional pursuits and the prevention of legal transactions that have lasted for more than ten years and try to compensate and correct the situation and not prepare new actions that are completely contrary to the legal order around the issue, which is a risk that exists all the time and the possibility of a solution to the issue will probably continue even if that is not part of the issue be.

It has been a matter of striving for a list of sowing seeds with plants under special conditions, which the representatives of the Estonian state have approved regarding the seed batch. Even if the seed had already been sold according to the existing minimum plan, based on the results of the sales trials, for collector use, the seed in question, according to the average size calculations, will cost more than 400,000 euros. Hemp tea is produced all the time by other entrepreneurs, practicing the profession has been prevented on illegal grounds for more than ten years. If the interest alone is calculated from compensation for damages, even with that amount the matters related to starting the company could already be taken care of. The sale of hemp tea has been prevented on illegal grounds, the amount of compensation paid so far below 400 euros is not sufficient. In the tests to sell a ready-made drink that has been hemp-produced by the so called hempman, one day work has been 500 euroes profit. Finish authorities has been illegally prevented in many ways to do this work and there is a must-remember thing that a same person has had also illegal prison sentences during over 10 year prevention to do that legal work that has been the main goal in life.

Already in 2007, the already registered oil hemp variety has lost its support due to readings over 0.2%, for which oil hemp is not even eligible for fiber support. What if there is no interest in lying about the matter, then is it appropriate to be the underdog sufferer of an ineffective practice in the matter? I will edit this later with more justification if necessary, reference: copy-pasted photo-album text-etc. "Finnish authorities, you must try to understand this following content: opening the so called Pandora's box of cannabis is entirely possible, however you want this to be served".

" In relation to permits in hemp cultivation: After all, they had tried to inquire about all possible permits, but the civil agriculture service and even so-called specialists in duty work did not know what kind of working practice there should be. There were several agricultural company names available to use in the production and work, which decreased as co-operative entities as the actions of the police and the judiciary progressed. They did not seem to get seed from anywhere, the law on fiber and oil plants and the plant breeding legislation made it possible to breed varieties. and the articles that were already in force seemed to be on the side of hemp cultivation. The THC content limit of 0.2% only applied to the fiber subsidy, for which the production of oil hemp was not even entitled. In 2007 Finola fields also lost their fiber subsidy due to readings above 0.2%, but still no one was sentenced to prison. Keitele city in the project, the agricultural expert head manager (later: the interwiew material) was also detained from his post and duty due to unfounded criminal suspicion, as was also the hemp man been stayed arrested during the labor office's meeting. "an grants to be granted". The continuation of the documentary would be able to clarify the fundamental legislative and practical problems related to the sector in a world wide scale so no other country would need to do same kind of mistakes of course depending how criminal their process involved authorities would be."

This text is a preliminary prototype and it may have spelling and sentence errors due to the lack of opportunities to do the practice anymore today, but its purpose and content can be shown to be absolutely correct.
You sent
You sent
"Man in Finland was prevented to do agricultural work and was placed living near of his broken tractor. He spent 5 years in a tiny house cabin filming and taking photographs about the tractor"

Comments

Top fan
Timothy Branch
https://areena.yle.fi/1-50944897...
Hempman vs. the State
AREENA.YLE.FI
Hempman vs. the State
Hempman vs. the State
ReplyRemove Preview2h
Most Relevant is selected, so some replies may have been filtered out.

Top fan
Timothy Branch
Not even a bud in the market in Europe that could be taxed and sold officially by companyes. A tea farmer that was going to make biofibers to a industrial use for old car´s replacement parts got sentenced.
No photo description available.
Reply1h
Timothy Branch
https://www.facebook.com/search/top?...tisia%20hamppu "Timothy Branch
"In what ways is this good news? In the past, tea has not been a food, just like coffee and tobacco are not, and its production would have been only easier for someone intending to become an entrepreneur. Now, with the food interpretation of green pulp, it is required to establish a food trade name under the Food Agency, yet there is no practical possibility to produce the product due to the ban on THC, which in Finland is contrary to the decisions of the Community Court. Arbitrary confiscation of products and destruction of crops as well as products will therefore continue to be possible." Millä tavoin kyseessä on hyvä uutinen. Aiemmin tee ei ole ollut elintarvike kuten ei kahvi ja tupakkakaan ole, ja sen tuottaminen yrittäjäksi aikovalle olisi ollut siten ainoastaan helpompaa. Nyt edellytetään vihermassan elintarviketulkinnan myötä ruokaviraston alaisen elintarviketoiminimen perustamista, silti tuotteen tuottamiseen ei ole käytännön mahdollisuutta THC-kiellon vuoksi, joka Suomella on yhteisötuomioistuimen päätöksien vastainen. Tuotteiden mielivaltainen takavarikointi ja sadon kuten tuotteidenkin tuhoaminen on näinollen jatkossakin mahdollista. " Timothy Branchhttps://www.facebook.com/210791788955382/photos/pb.100063468492163.-2207520000./2647329725301564/?type=3😐
May be an image of text that says 'puutarhakasvina pohjautuu YK:n (koristekasvi) h on ilman lupaa. Säädös 28 artiklan 2 kohtaan. Huumausainelain momentti sulkee siis yksiselitteisesti pois hampun käytettäväksi huumausaineena tai huumausaineen almistuksessa tai tuotannossa. Siten myös viljely lääkinnällistä THC:n käyttöä varten on kiellettyä ja siten laítonta. Suomesta puuttuu YK:n huumausaineyleissopimuksessa mainittu hampun lääkekasvatuksen kansallinen lainsäädäntö muun muassa valvonta- lupamääräyksineen ja velvollisuudesta luovuttaa lääkehamppu ns valtion kannabísviranomaiselle, minkä johdosta ei ole mahdollista missään muodossa kasvattaa hamppua lääkinnällisiin tarkoituksiin. Lupaa hampun kasvattamiseen huumausainetarkoitukseen ei siis voi saada. Hampun lehtien myyminen hampputeenă on teoriassa mandollista vain, jos valmiste ei sisällã lainkaan kannabinoleja. TIEA 1208'
Reply8mEdited

Top fan
Timothy Branch
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=100063468492163
Free Timo Haara
Free Timo Haara
Free Timo Haara
ReplyRemove Preview2h

Top fan
Timothy Branch
Cannabis Sativa farming and producing for example a tea from it has been possible to do in a European union from a year 1997. Allthough there are many kind of problems, like there is still no existing clear rules for a THC content levels in the products. Following article including in a Suomen kuvalehti is still on the same phase and two countryes, Finland and Estonia have not done anything to clarify the situation. https://suomenkuvalehti.fi/.../hampu...a-huumetta.../... ""James Callaway, a researcher at the University of Kuopio, started cultivating hemp in 1995. He developed Finola, a variety that flowers naturally in Finland and produces seeds. The drug reputation of hemp overshadowed the work of the refiner. Callaway's hemp oil was under police investigation, and the harassment forced him to relocate.
Environmental manager Tatu Saarikko continued processing Finola and did the final work on hemp. He had received three fines for using cannabis. The authorities suspected that the research plants would end up as drugs. Although Saarikko had reported the cultivations, the police destroyed the blooms in 2003 and 2007.
Laboratory tests proved that the plants were legal. You can't get to the cloud by burning oil hemp blossoms.
Last year, twenty Finnish farmers harvested 118 hectares of hemp, mainly for fiber. Timo Haara would like to be one of them, but this summer it is not possible.
He should be in Kuopio County Prison.
In April 2009, the Iisalmi district court sentenced Haara, a first-timer, to 2.5 years of unconditional imprisonment. The verdict stated that Haara had grown dozens of cannabis plants and seedlings for drug use in the years 2006-2008 and sought a criminal profit of 64,000 euros. According to the police, he had been selling marijuana in southern Finland.
Haara's view is different.
Indoor plants were processed into a raw material for medicine, and legal hemp grew in the field. He confessed that he had given 300 grams of the narcotic to two of his acquaintances as painkillers.
"The only monetary compensation was 200 euros," he says now.
The Court of Appeal reduced the sentence to 1.6 years and dismissed the second charge of aggravated drug crime. The THC content of the plants grown in the field, 1.5 percent, was so low that the hemp would not be a narcotic, the Court of Appeal concluded.
The difference between legal and illegal hemp is undefined.
In 1972, the police confiscated the first home cultivation of cannabis. The verdict was handed down even though the marijuana contained only 0.2 percent THC. Now the same number is the limit of EU agricultural support; if there is more intoxicating substance, you will lose the support. But can there be 0.5 percent or 1.5 percent psychoactive THC before hemp is a drug? (medicine) Or three percent as some researchers have suggested?
There is no limit value in the law or regulations. The police, prosecutors and judges each interpret in their own way. Timo Haara applied to the Supreme Court for leave to appeal. He wanted a preliminary decision on how much narcotic substance can be in hemp without requiring a narcotic manufacturing license for production.
The Supreme Court did not take up the case.
Even a small amount of the intoxicant for the plant is beneficial. The sticky resin protects against diseases and pests. (and can be a medicinal part of the plant)
On May 12th, Haara received a letter to Estonia: he will be sent to prison in his homeland. He asked for a postponement until autumn, so that the crops would not be neglected. Six days later, the petition was denied.
"I'm not running away from judgment," he says.
The nearby Lihula police station knows the Finn and his hemp. Haara would like to serve the prison sentence in Estonia, which he considers illegal.
He has one wish: first to collect the crop, then the police can fix the farmer." = So that was over 10 years ago that that interwiew was given and things have only gone worse; got to the jail, lost many crops, lost two farms and other facitilities, lost a company that´s registration expired while waiting, lost even the original finnish-named facebook-account while have thrown to jails, having a justice paymant bills still to pay, got one hundred euro´s compensation and remaining still in the criminal investigation from the 2021 growing of cannabis. And there are still no existing rules how much different products can contain THC in Europe in them. Having the most largest justice case collection in Europe waiting for authorities to clear things with that and all this is for some leaf tea that has been in the market and sold by different farmers with a variating rules at the same time for that over 10 years now. For Your information, @Your service, Timothy Branch
SUOMENKUVALEHTI.FI
Hampusta saa huumetta, lääkettä ja ravintoa: Missä on laittomuuden raja?…
Hampusta saa huumetta, lääkettä ja ravintoa: Missä on laittomuuden raja?…
ReplyRemove Preview2h

Top fan
Timothy Branch
"Finland, like the entire European Union, lacks working guidelines on the permitted thc concentrations of different products and labeling of products based on the above practice, which has been tried to be achieved in the set of legal cases th vs the state since 2007, Finland has also made wrong legal decisions and the judgments should have been overturned already.
The court has stated in two countries that "the purpose of the production is unclear" and in that situation the judgments have still been read. The basis of the application of the law is that if the matter in the indictment is unclear, then the matter should be decided in favor of the suspect of the crime, this has not been done, which in itself is against the legal process and legal order.
Finland does not allow any kind of concentrations for THC in the branch vs. state case, even though it is a typical characteristic of the plant, and there must also be a possibility of legal production for THC because it can also be a medicine or its raw material.
At the same time, for example, production of tea elsewhere in the EU has existed throughout this period between 2007 and 2023 and still exists.
From the 2009 investigation, the police have destroyed e.g. evidence in the form of a product ordered from elsewhere in the eu, which has been a tea made from cannabis green pulp, and which has tested positive for thc in a preliminary THC rapid test, this sample has been tampered with from the investigation, most obviously on purpose, to prevent things from being cleared up.
Already in 2009, the decision that, in Finland's opinion, cannabis green pulp products must not contain THC at all, contradicts the previous decision of the EU's Community Court (Hammarsten vs. the State of Sweden), and grounds for overturning the judgments are demonstrable and exist in many ways.
Let's refer to the material already shown on Suomi-tv more than 10 years ago, there are illegal legality processes in Finland and Estonia where wrong decisions have been made, evidences has also been ignored and the use of evidence such as witness statements has been prevented. Timothy Branch
Reply1h